Welcome to the website of Michael Heim. I am a freelance journalist and author. You will find some of my writing here. It will give you an idea about what I do and how I do it.
At the same time, this page is meant as an insurance. Time and again, I have posted threads approaching full article length on social media - not hot takes, but thought-out arguments involving a significant amount of research.
These pieces are swept away in the torrent of new posts. And they might vanish altogether when a platform bites the dust. I have learned that lesson the hard way when Google+ shut down. A fair bit of writing evaporated that day, along with more than 6000 followers.
Now I keep copies. If I think they are worth it. But please judge for yourself.
You like what you read, would perhaps like to cooperate and get in touch? Please do.
New insights change the perspective on falling birth rates. A different approach is needed to reverse the trend.
The decline is no longer down to couples deciding they don't want kids, or can't afford to have them, or a lack of childcare. That matters much less than in the past. The main driver of falling birth rates is: staying single.
Huge amounts of training data for military AI are generated in Ukraine. It is a unique asset, especially for fighting in similar circumstances. But in a more dynamic conflict, it can cause AI systems to make deadly mistakes.
Video from 15.000 drones on the front line is captured and stored in Ukraine, amounting to 2 million hours of battlefield footage since the war started. The footage is invaluable for teaching AI to interpret what is happening on a battlefield. The AI model essentially observes what human drone operators have focused on, what they have identified as a target, what they have tried to hit. AI learns to do all that, too – but once the training is complete, it can act much faster.
Trump will demand that Nato allies raise their defence spending to 5% of GDP. That is a huge step. What are the trade-offs? And would security really improve?
Even to defence hawks, Trump's demand looks unrealistic. Word is that he will settle for less: 3.5% is the number being talked about. Yet most national governments in Nato are reluctant to spend more than 2% of GDP, the target all members have agreed to. Some countries, like Spain, Italy and Canada, are still far below that level.
The current spending target, ambitious as it may seem to some, is barely enough to finance the status quo. Much larger sums will be needed to improve defence significantly. From a security perspective, the advice is straightforward: Members should pour as much money as possible into their armies, navies and air forces. But could it go wrong?
Original predictions posted on Twitter, 9 November 2016.
A few days after Donald Trump was elected as president for the first time in 2016, nobody, including the man himself, could predict how his term would turn out. I decided that I would try.
My predictions would almost certainly be wrong, but they provided a baseline of assumptions – something to work with in the face of overwhelming uncertainty. Primarily, though, predicting the future was (and is) a tool to reckon with the present, in both of its aspects: the state of affairs and the direction of pull.
For that reason, the right benchmark for judging predictions is not their accuracy but how useful they are. They provide a compass, not a road map. Being right doesn't matter. Knowing what to look out for does.
They also turned out to be a little less wrong than I expected.
The dome: Have a close look. Then blink. It's gone.
There is a reason I am posting this particular photo this week. Six years ago, the events unfolding under this dome changed an entire country overnight, in the most terrible way imaginable.
The building itself played a crucial role in these events. It all happened early in the morning of 22nd February 2006, when a group of men approached the entrance and overwhelmed the guards. They were wearing uniforms of the Iraqi Special Forces, but in fact belonged to the gang of Abu Musab az-Zarqawi, the most ruthless killer in the Iraqi conflict, leader of "al-Qaida in Iraq".
A warning: The photos in this post are graphic and not suitable for people who can't see blood. Also, if you are at risk of self-harm, I'd recommend to stay away. This is about a deeply religious event, but still, some people might find the images disturbing – even shocking.
The photos you will see below are from my archive, taken in the early 1990s, but they couldn't be more current. They show a ritual of extreme mourning, and the last time it was performed was yesterday. That's because yesterday marked the end of a 40-day mourning period for a religious leader who has been slaughtered, along with almost all of the people who were with him, by a rival for the position of leading the faithful.